Criteria 6

Criteria 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management

 

Key Indicator- 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership

 
Metric No. 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership Download
6.1.1 The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long term Institutional Perspective Plan.  
Additional information 6.1.1_1
Link for Additional information 6.1.1_2

Key Indicator- 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment

 
Metric No. 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment Download
6.2.1 The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc  
Additional information 6.2.1
Link for Additional information 6.2.1
Institutional perspective Plan and deployment documents on the website 6.2.1
6.2.2 Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
1. Administration
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examination
6.2.2
Screen shots of user interfaces of each module reflecting the name of the HEI 6.2.2_1
Links for any other relevant document to support the claim 6.2.2_2
Institutional expenditure statements for the budget heads of e-governance implementation ERP Document 6.2.2_3
Annual e-governance report approved by the Governing Council/ Board of Management/ Syndicate Policy document on e-governance ------

Key Indicator- 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies

 
Metric No. 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies Download
6.3.1 The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression  
Additional information 6.3.1_1
6.3.2 Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attendconferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professionalbodies during the last five years 0.0%
Number of teachers provided with financial support to attendconferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professionalbodies year wise during the last five years 0.0
Institutional data 6.3.2_1
6.3.3 Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes(MDPs) professional development /administrative training programs duringthe last five years 56.77%
Refresher course/Faculty Orientation or other programmes as per UGC/AICTE stipulated periods, as participated by teachers year-wise. 6.3.3_1
 Links for any other relevant document to support the claim  ------
Institutional data 6.3.3_3
Copy of the certificates of the program attended by teachers. 6.3.3_4
Annual reports highlighting the programmes undertaken by the teachers 6.3.3_5

Key Indicator- 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization

 
Metric No. 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization Download
6.4.1 Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ nongovernment organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external)  
Additional information 6.4.1_1

Key Indicator- 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System

 
Metric No. 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System Download
6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities  
Additional information 6.5.1_1
6.5.2

Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:

  1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); quality improvement initiatives identified and implemented
  2. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow-up action taken
  3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s)
  4. Participation in NIRF and other recognized rankings
  5. Any other quality audit/accreditation recognized by state, national or international agencies such as NAAC, NBA etc.
 
Links for any other relevant document to support the claim 6.5.2_1
NIRF report, AAA report and details on follow up actions 6.5.2_2
List of Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) along with brochures and geo-tagged photos with caption and date. 6.5.2_3
Link to Minute of IQAC meetings, hosted on HEI website 6.5.2_4